[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b479bc81-f72f-b4c0-b9eb-c8fc4dd71fbb@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:29:31 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Documentation: mmc: add description for new caps
在 2016/6/22 23:06, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> Let's add some basic description for cap-no-sdio,
>> cap-no-sd and cap-no-mmc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> index ecc007a..e16d42b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ Optional properties:
>> - cap-power-off-card: powering off the card is safe
>> - cap-mmc-hw-reset: eMMC hardware reset is supported
>> - cap-sdio-irq: enable SDIO IRQ signalling on this interface
>> +- cap-no-sdio: skip sending sdio cmd during initialization
>> +- cap-no-sd: skip sending sd cmd during initialization
>> +- cap-no-mmc: skip sending mmc cmd during initialization
>
> In the past it has been determined that the "cap-" prefix is
> unnecessary. Some properties still have "cap-" because of backward
> compatibility reasons, but as I understand it new properties shouldn't
> start with "cap-".
>
> See <https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-June/034664.html>
> for reference.
>
Really? was that the final decision? I just see Olof complained it but
don't see other comments from dt maintainer or from mmc
maintainer(Chris Ball)?
Hi Ulf and Rob,
What is your opinion?
> -Doug
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists