[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160623124433.GE8415@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:44:33 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] x86/UV, x86/efi: Re-factor efi_call_virt for
general use
On Wed, 15 Jun, at 02:04:12PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> This patchset creates a general purpose version of the efi_call_virt
> macro that does not assume that the function pointer being passed in is
> inside of efi.systab->runtime. It also fixes up uv_bios_call to use the
> new functionality, and does a bit of cleanup in the efi_thunk macro.
>
> Quick breakdown of the patches:
>
> Patch 1) Move necessary macros to locations where we can access them.
> Remove hard-coded efi.systab reference from efi_call_virt.
> Rename/create new macros as needed.
> Patch 2) Simple change to allow UV code to utilize the new
> functionality. Included a detailed explanation of how we got
> here.
> Patch 3) Replace a few bits of the efi_thunk macro with the
> arch_efi_call_setup/teardown macros.
>
> The first two have been tested on simulators and hardware, but the third
> has only been compile-tested. I don't have any hardware to test that
> on.
>
> Updates for v2:
>
> - Fix up arm and arm64 versions of arch_efi_call_virt. I missed these
> on my first pass
> - Add some more detail to the commit message for the uv_bios_call fix.
> - Change the third patch to use the arch_efi_call_setup/teardown macros
> inside of the efi_thunk macro, instead of replacing efi_thunk entirely
> for the CONFIG_EFI_MIXED case.
Whole series looks good to me Alex, and everything works fine on my
mixed-mode config. Applied for v4.8, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists