linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] Bad flicker on skylake HQD due to code in the 4.7 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1466686369.6831.1.camel@snewbury.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:52:49 +0100
From:	Steven Newbury <steve@...wbury.org.uk>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Bad flicker on skylake HQD due to code in the 4.7
 merge window

On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 14:53 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:06 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:12PM -0700, James Bottomley
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 14:29 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 23:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > > > I guess we'll need the bisect on this one to make
> > > > > > > progress.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sigh, I was afraid that might be the next step.
> > > > > 
> > > > > OK, I have a curious data point.  I assumed the problem would
> > > > > be
> > > > > somewhere in the drm update, so I started bisecting that at
> > > > > the
> > > > > top. 
> > > > >  However, the top most commit:
> > > > > 
> > > > > commit 1d6da87a3241deb13d073c4125d19ed0e5a0c62c
> > > > > Merge: 1f40c49 a39ed68
> > > > > Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > > > Date:   Mon May 23 11:48:48 2016 -0700
> > > > > 
> > > > >     Merge branch 'drm-next' of
> > > > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux
> > > > > 
> > > > > Isn't actually bad.  There's no flicker here, so whatever
> > > > > caused
> > > > > the
> > > > > problem came from some update after this.
> > > > 
> > > > There was a fixes pull after this. Might be worth it to
> > > > restrict
> > > > to
> > > > just
> > > > the i915 changes, which are just
> > > > 5b4fd5b1111b1230cd037..157d2c7fad0863222
> > > > 
> > > > Looking at those nothing seems to stick out which might explain
> > > > what's
> > > > happening for you.
> > 
> > OK, so just on the firmware, the system seems less flickery with
> > the
> > new 1.4.3 UEFI, so I'm starting to think it is a Skylake errata 
> > issue.  The flicker isn't gone for good, but seems to be reboot 
> > dependent (it's there in some boots, but gone on a reboot).
> > 
> > > This should be easy enough to try before bisecting:
> > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466162081-12042-1-g
> > > it
> > > -s
> > > end-email-mika.kahola@...el.com
> > 
> > Applying this didn't seem to make a difference: still there on
> > some 
> > and gone on other reboots.
> 
> OK, my candidate bad commit is this one:
> 
> commit a05628195a0d9f3173dd9aa76f482aef692e46ee
> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 11 10:23:51 2016 +0300
> 
>     drm/i915: Get panel_type from OpRegion panel details
> 
> After being more careful about waiting to identify flicker, this one
> seems to be the one the bisect finds.  I'm now running v4.7-rc3 with
> this one reverted and am currently seeing no flicker problems.  It
> is,
> however, early days because the flicker can hide for long periods, so
> I
> 'll wait until Monday evening and a few reboots before declaring
> victory.
> 
> 
I'm seeing this on my IvyBridge.  I'll try reverting the commit here
too, to see if it's the same issue.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)