[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160623135429.GK30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:54:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com,
bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] sched: Remove SD_WAKE_AFFINE flag and replace
it with SD_BALANCE_WAKE
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:04:33PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun, at 09:49:32AM, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1014,7 +1014,6 @@ extern void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head);
> > #define SD_BALANCE_EXEC 0x0004 /* Balance on exec */
> > #define SD_BALANCE_FORK 0x0008 /* Balance on fork, clone */
> > #define SD_BALANCE_WAKE 0x0010 /* Balance on wakeup */
> > -#define SD_WAKE_AFFINE 0x0020 /* Wake task to waking CPU */
> > #define SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY 0x0080 /* Domain members share cpu power */
> > #define SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN 0x0100 /* Domain members share power domain */
> > #define SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES 0x0200 /* Domain members share cpu pkg resources */
>
> I'm curious - doesn't this break userspace ABI? These flags are
> exported via procfs, so I would have assumed removing or changing the
> value of any of these constants would be forbidden.
Generally I ignore this little issue. Also, I suppose we should move
that whole sched_domain cruft into /debug/sched/ or so.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists