[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160623103920.36195c3a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:39:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix oops caused by graph notrace filter
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:20:31 -0400 (EDT)
Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com> wrote:
> I tried the patch, if just for resolving the oops issue, it's indeed enough.
> But if we care about just this filter, and compare this with the trace_graph_entry
> filter handling, I found that, the depth 0 item will be submitted to the ring buffer, not
> respecting the filter. I still use the same steps. It's possible to show schedule entry:
Sure, I just wanted to make sure nothing got off, and made the quick
patch.
Want to send an updated patch that goes this route? That is, make it
such that the latency tracers fully support the set_graph_notrace.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists