[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24080992-801c-4606-c801-65ee68cf8779@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:03:01 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@...il.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: fix segment checks when L1
is in long mode.
On 18/06/2016 11:01, Quentin Casasnovas wrote:
> Cross-checking the KVM/VMX VMREAD emulation code with the Intel Software
> Developper Manual Volume 3C - "VMREAD - Read Field from Virtual-Machine
> Control Structure", I found that we're enforcing that the destination
> operand is NOT located in a read-only data segment or any code segment when
> the L1 is in long mode - BUT that check should only happen when it is in
> protected mode.
>
> Shuffling the code a bit to make our emulation follow the specification
> allows me to boot a Xen dom0 in a nested KVM and start HVM L2 guests
> without problems.
That's great, and I'm applying the patch, but it's also pretty weird. :)
Do you have a pointer to Xen source code that does a VMREAD into a
read-only data segment or a code segment?
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists