[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160623185037.GA12650@cyborg>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:50:37 +0200
From: Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995@...il.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
trivial@...nel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995@...il.com>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index e99df0f..c7f6f5b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void clock_was_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
static DECLARE_WORK(hrtimer_work, clock_was_set_work);
/*
- * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogramm the hrtimer
+ * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogram the hrtimer
* interrupt device on all cpus.
*/
void clock_was_set_delayed(void)
@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
/*
* Note: We clear the running state after enqueue_hrtimer and
- * we do not reprogramm the event hardware. Happens either in
+ * we do not reprogram the event hardware. Happens either in
* hrtimer_start_range_ns() or in hrtimer_interrupt()
*
* Note: Because we dropped the cpu_base->lock above,
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists