[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576C52B0.5080504@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:20:48 -0700
From: Sai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <mgalbraith@...e.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] sched/fair: Avoid pulling tasks from non-overloaded
higher capacity groups
Hi Morten,
On 06/22/2016 10:03 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
[...]
>
> +/*
> + * group_smaller_cpu_capacity: Returns true if sched_group sg has smaller
> + * per-cpu capacity than sched_group ref.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +group_smaller_cpu_capacity(struct sched_group *sg, struct sched_group *ref)
> +{
> + return sg->sgc->max_capacity * capacity_margin <
> + ref->sgc->max_capacity * 1024;
> +}
> +
> static inline enum
> group_type group_classify(struct sched_group *group,
> struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
> @@ -6892,6 +6903,19 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> if (sgs->avg_load <= busiest->avg_load)
> return false;
>
> + if (!(env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY))
> + goto asym_packing;
> +
> + /* Candidate sg has no more than one task per cpu and has
> + * higher per-cpu capacity. Migrating tasks to less capable
> + * cpus may harm throughput. Maximize throughput,
> + * power/energy consequences are not considered.
> + */
> + if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= sgs->group_weight &&
> + group_smaller_cpu_capacity(sds->local, sg))
> + return false;
> +
> +asym_packing:
What about the case where IRQ/RT work reduces the capacity of some of these bigger CPUs? sgc->max_capacity might not necessarily capture that case.
Thanks,
-Sai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists