linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST, PATCH] builddeb: really include objtool binary in headers package

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160623225104.GA13461@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:51:04 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bjorn@...k.no, mmarek@...e.cz,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST, PATCH] builddeb: really include objtool binary in
 headers package

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:44:22PM +0000, Wilfried Klaebe wrote:
> On May 4th, Bjørn Mork provided patch
> 697bbc7b832048d3a679cd55caf2268a325efbe0 to include objtool binaries in
> the headers package. However, that one only works if $srctree=$objtree,
> because the objtool binaries are not written to the srctree, but
> to the objtree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wilfried Klaebe <linux-kernel@...enslange-mailadresse.de>
> ---
>  builddeb |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>