linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dm: add infrastructure for DAX support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1466724984.3504.380.camel@hpe.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 23:36:25 +0000
From:	"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To:	"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:	"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	"ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
	"yigal@...xistor.com" <yigal@...xistor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dm: add infrastructure for DAX support

On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
 :
> +static int device_supports_dax(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> +			       sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(dev->bdev);
> +
> +	return q && blk_queue_dax(q);
> +}
> +
> +static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t)
> +{
> +	struct dm_target *ti;
> +	unsigned i = 0;
> +
> +	/* Ensure that all targets support DAX. */
> +	while (i < dm_table_get_num_targets(t)) {
> +		ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i++);
> +
> +		if (!ti->type->direct_access)
> +			return false;
> +
> +		if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
> +		    !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_supports_dax,
> NULL))
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the update.  I have a question about the above change.  Targets may
have their own parameters.  For instance, dm-stripe has 'chunk_size', which is
checked in stripe_ctr().  DAX adds additional restriction that chunk_size
needs to be aligned by page size.  So, I think we need to keep target
responsible to verify if DAX can be supported.  What do you think?

Thanks,
-Toshi