lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:28:43 +0900
From:	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To:	SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Cc:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Doc/memory-barriers: Add Korean translation

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:41:54PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hello, Byungchul,
> 
> 
> I guess the review is ongoing yet and maybe it requires more days.  Can you let
> me know your estimated time for the review if it doesn't bother you?

Hello,

I am sorry for respending lately. This week was one of busiest week I've
ever had. I have a plan to look at it next week. I will give you my
opinions by next tuesday briefly, and add more concrete ones by next
friday. Anyway, I also support your work done.

Thank you,
Byungchul

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> SeongJae Park
> 
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:47:34PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >> 2016-06-09 5:45 GMT+09:00 SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>:
> >> > 2016-06-09 2:24 GMT+09:00 Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:58:41PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >> >>> This commit adds Korean version of memory-barriers.txt document.  The
> >> >>> header is refered to HOWTO Korean version.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The translator, SeongJae Park, is interested in parallel programming and
> >> >>> translating[1] a book[2] about the topic.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The translation has started from Feb, 2016 and using a github public
> >> >>> repository[3] to maintain the work.  The work is following[4] updates to
> >> >>> the original document as well.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Because the translator has knowledge about the topic and already
> >> >>> following up the upstream changes, one would sure that this translation
> >> >>> will keep reasonable quality and freshness.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/perfbook.git/commit/FAQ.txt?id=edbfcdee0460
> >> >>> [2] https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/perfbook/perfbook.html
> >> >>> [3] https://github.com/sjp38/linux.doc_trans_membarrier
> >> >>> [4] https://github.com/sjp38/linux.doc_trans_membarrier/commit/06bd12d390f164fd253b861fc3aa8006d6d19ed9
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
> >> >>> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Parl E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> >>> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> >> >>
> >> >> I cannot judge this, so I must defer to Minchan.  That said, the diffstat
> >> >> since your version of April 18 is as follows:
> >> >>
> >> >>  memory-barriers.txt |  303 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >> >>  1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> I cannot tell which mainline version these patches correspond to, but the
> >> >> English version has this diffstat since v4.5:
> >> >>
> >> >>  memory-barriers.txt |  293 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> >>  1 file changed, 234 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> So your level of change thus far seems plausible.
> >> >
> >> > I agree that Minchan deserves to judge that since he is the Korean translations
> >> > maintainer.
> >>
> >> Minchan, may I ask your opinion about this patch?
> >
> > Sorry for late response.
> >
> > I think it's really worth. That's why I support it. However, until now,
> > I didn't review it in detail. Sorry about that and stuck with urgent
> > works so I asked colleague byungchul who scheduler guy, he has an
> > interest so He will review this patch soon.
> >
> > Hope it helps you.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists