linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Virtually mapped stacks with guard pages (x86, core)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwJ1=pyr9fP_UzDjnyX2qJ4mpxg_DTTiOJTv9PFW4dHgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:21:50 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Virtually mapped stacks with guard pages (x86, core)

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>   *
>   * rdi: prev task we switched from
> + * rsi: task we're switching to
>   */
>  ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> -    LOCK ; btr $TIF_FORK, TI_flags(%r8)
> +    LOCK ; btr $TIF_FORK, TI_flags(%rsi)    /* rsi: this newly forked task */
>
>      call    schedule_tail            /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>
> I think you forgot GET_THREAD_INFO() here.  RSI is the task, not the
> thread_info.  FYI, this goes away with my switch_to() rewrite, which
> removes TIF_FORK.

The point of that patch series is to make the thread_info and the
task_struct pointer have the same value on x86 - we hide the
thread_info inside the task_struct itself, and in fact at the
beginning of it.

That allows for the above kinds of simplification - use the task
struct pointer and thread info interchangably in the asm code.

But as mentioned, I must have missed something. There were a number of
places where the code used the task_stack_page() and
task_thread_info() interchangably, which used to work and is no longer
true. There might simply be cases I missed.

Or there might simply be cases I screwed up.

                Linus