linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] ftrace: Reduce size of function graph entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160624132904.1a94c0fc@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:29:04 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] ftrace: Reduce size of function graph entries

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 01:15:34 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:04:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:35:44 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >   
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > > > index dea12a6e413b..35c523ba5c59 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> > > > > @@ -751,25 +751,33 @@ extern void ftrace_init(void);
> > > > >  static inline void ftrace_init(void) { }
> > > > >  #endif
> > > > >  
> > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_ACCESS
> > > > > +# define FTRACE_ALIGNMENT	4
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > +# define FTRACE_ALIGNMENT	8
> > > > > +#endif    
> > > > 
> 
> As far as I can see, the ring buffer has following code in ring_buffer.c:
> 
>   #define RB_ALIGNMENT		4U
>   #define RB_MAX_SMALL_DATA	(RB_ALIGNMENT * RINGBUF_TYPE_DATA_TYPE_LEN_MAX)
>   #define RB_EVNT_MIN_SIZE	8U	/* two 32bit words */
> 
>   #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_ACCESS
>   # define RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT	0
>   # define RB_ARCH_ALIGNMENT		RB_ALIGNMENT
>   #else
>   # define RB_FORCE_8BYTE_ALIGNMENT	1
>   # define RB_ARCH_ALIGNMENT		8U
>   #endif
> 
>   #define RB_ALIGN_DATA		__aligned(RB_ARCH_ALIGNMENT)
> 

Right, what I meant was that we should just define FTRACE_ALIGNMENT
unconditionally to 4. If CONFIG_HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_ACCESS is not set,
it will add the buffered space regardless.

You already moved "overrun", I don't see anything that would be out of
alignment if the structure itself is aligned.

-- Steve