lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576D6E50.6000604@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:30:56 -0500
From:	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	<linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] hwmon: Add support for INA3221 Triple
 Current/Voltage Monitors

On 06/24/2016 11:46 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:02:51AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 06/18/2016 10:16 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> The chip registers are 16 bit. Can you repeat the command using the "w"
>>> option ?
>>>
>>
>> # i2cdump -y 2 0x40 w
>>      0,8  1,9  2,a  3,b  4,c  5,d  6,e  7,f
>> 00: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 08: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 10: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 18: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 20: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 28: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 30: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 38: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 40: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 48: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 50: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 58: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 60: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 68: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 70: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 78: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 80: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 88: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 90: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 98: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> a0: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> a8: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> b0: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> b8: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> c0: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> c8: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> d0: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> d8: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> e0: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> e8: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> f0: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> f8: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 

Feel free to completely ignore the first register dump I sent, I did it
for the wrong device anyway :).

I had just gotten done reading this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/459
and accidentally got EVMs confused did the test for the TMP461, but it
does look like on startup register 0x16 can be used to differentiate the
parts, if the TMP461 hadn't gone into a different driver.

Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ