[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160625165113.GA4362@amd>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:51:13 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Varun Koyyalagunta <cpudebug@...ttech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4][RFC v2] PM / sleep: Avoid accessing frozen_cpus if
it is NULL
On Sun 2016-06-26 00:18:30, Chen Yu wrote:
> frozen_cpus might be NULL if the allocation in previous
> alloc_frozen_cpus failed, when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> is set.
>
> This patch avoid accessing this cpumask if it is NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index d948e44..d25266e 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,8 @@ int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
> {
> int cpu, first_cpu, error = 0;
>
> + if (frozen_cpus == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> cpu_maps_update_begin();
> first_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> /*
I'd say that whoever allocates frozen_cpus should just abort the
hibernation if there's not enough memory for the operation...? This
seems like checking for the problem too late.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists