linux-kernel - Re: regression caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook too early")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Jun 2016 02:03:37 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: regression caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set
 utilization update hook too early")

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net> wrote:
> On 2016.06.17 08:32 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
>> Second, sorry again for report incorrect commit,
>> I were too tired this morning so I remember the wrong commit.
>> The regression is caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not
>> set utilization update hook too early"), so I update the email title.
>
> Summary:
>
> Isn't running powertop itself a significant contributor here?

It shouldn't be, because the overhead in question comes from
->setpolicy and powertop itself should not cause it to be invoked that
often.

Thanks,
Rafael