linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1466937715-6683-3-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:41:55 -0400
From:	Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
	Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock()

An over-committed guest with more vCPUs than pCPUs has a heavy overload
in osq_lock().

This is because vCPU A hold the osq lock and yield out, vCPU B wait
per_cpu node->locked to be set. IOW, vCPU B wait vCPU A to run and
unlock the osq lock.

So lets also use neet_yield_to() to detect if we need stop the spinning

Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index 05a3785..4287603 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ static inline int encode_cpu(int cpu_nr)
 	return cpu_nr + 1;
 }
 
+static inline int node_cpu(struct optimistic_spin_node *node)
+{
+	return node->cpu - 1;
+}
+
 static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *decode_cpu(int encoded_cpu_val)
 {
 	int cpu_nr = encoded_cpu_val - 1;
@@ -84,9 +89,10 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
 bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 {
 	struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
-	struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next;
+	struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next, *prev_old;
 	int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
 	int old;
+	unsigned int yield_count;
 
 	node->locked = 0;
 	node->next = NULL;
@@ -114,14 +120,20 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 	 * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
 	 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
 	 */
-
+	prev_old = prev;
+	yield_count = vcpu_get_yield_count(node_cpu(prev));
 	while (!READ_ONCE(node->locked)) {
 		/*
 		 * If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block.
 		 */
-		if (need_resched())
+		if (need_resched() ||
+			need_yield_to(node_cpu(prev), yield_count))
 			goto unqueue;
 
+		prev = READ_ONCE(node->prev);
+		if (prev != prev_old)
+			yield_count = vcpu_get_yield_count(node_cpu(prev));
+
 		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
 	}
 	return true;
-- 
2.4.11