[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r3bjxzw7.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:09:13 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Laurent <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Guennadi <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-DT <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: of: add type property
Hi Rob
Thank you for your review
> > +Each ports / port / endpoint can have its type if needed.
>
> I think type should only apply to a port. ports is only a grouping for
> multiple ports. endpoints are just the connection. A port is a single
> data flow, so 2 endpoints on a port reflect 2 possible connections for
> that data flow.
>
> > +child node can take over parent node type. below example indicates
> > +device0 type is "typeA" && "typeB",
> > +device1 type is "typeA" && "typeB" && "typeC".
>
> This does not make sense to me. A concrete example perhaps using HDMI
> audio would be helpful.
"type" on "port" only is OK. I will fix that.
Multi type feature (= take over from parent) and type on "endpoint"
is not urgent at this point, so I will drop these in v2.
I just thought that it will be necessary in the future.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists