[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160627072027.GC3341@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:50:27 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] cpufreq: Avoid warning during resume by return
EAGAIN if cpufreq is unavailable
On 27-06-16, 03:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1544,9 +1544,6 @@ static unsigned int cpufreq_update_curre
> {
> unsigned int new_freq;
>
> - if (cpufreq_suspended)
> - return 0;
> -
> new_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
> if (!new_freq)
> return 0;
> @@ -2280,6 +2277,10 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int c
> * -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
> */
> if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> + if (cpufreq_suspended) {
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> new_policy.cur = cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
> if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) {
> ret = -EIO;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists