[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x==ZeqVpTXP4j4YnQp+gwuZDW6vS0p9dBVw_HNOfd720_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:26:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> So IMO all of the callers should be made clamp the target frequency
> between min and max and those checks should be dropped from the
> low-level helpers.
Okay, so doing this from all these very low level helpers can be avoided
by moving them to cpufreq_frequency_table_target() at least for now.
Later on we can see on how we can update the callers and see how
it works best.
Thanks for the review.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists