[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160627140043.GO30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:00:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
paulus@...ba.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org, Waiman.Long@....com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, will.deacon@....com, dave@...olabs.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check
interface
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 01:41:28PM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -3293,6 +3293,15 @@ static inline void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> +#ifdef arch_vcpu_is_preempted
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + return arch_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
> +}
> +#else
> +#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) false
> +#endif
#ifndef vcpu_is_preempted
#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) (false)
#endif
Is so much simpler...
Also, please Cc the virt list so that other interested parties can
comment, and maybe also the s390 folks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists