linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160627145457.GA26980@mail.hallyn.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:54:57 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, luto@...nel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CAPABILITIES" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: add capability cgroup controller

Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@...nel.org):
> Hello, Topi.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com> wrote:
> > The parent might be able do it if proc/pid/xyz files are still
> > accessible after child exit but before its exit status is collected. But
> > if the parent doesn't do it (and you are not able to change it to do it)
> > and it collects the exit status without collecting other info, can you
> > suggest a different way how another process could collect it 100% reliably?
> 
> I'm not saying that there's such mechanism now. I'm suggesting that
> that'd be a more fitting way of implementing a new mechanism to track
> capability usages.

Hi Topi,

I think Eric was right a few emails earlier that the audit subsystem is
really the most appropriate answer to this.  (Perhaps sysctl-controllered?)
Combined with taskstats it would give you what you need.  Or you could even
use an empty new named cgroup controller, say 'none,name=caps', and then
look only at audit results for cgroup '/myapp' in the caps hierarchy.