[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160627145445.GA29321@leverpostej>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:54:46 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: BUG?: kernel does not (re)set irq smp_affinity to reboot_cpu
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 02:53:16PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Note this does not mean that all pm_power_off implementations
> are going to be happy with machine_power_off leaving irqs
> enabled, I would esp. expect the efi and psci implementations
> to potentially be unhappy about this. See below for a proposal
> to deal with this.
Neither PSCI nor EFI care either way about interrupts.
PSCI makes synchronous HVC/SMC calls to a higher exception level, and
can be safely called with interrupts enabled or disabled.
EFI's ResetSystem (which backs pm_power_off) can be called with
interrupts enabled or disabled, so long as there is not a clashing call
in progress already (see 7.1 "Runtime Services Rules and Restrictions")
in the EFI 2.6 spec.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists