linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] kexec_file: Factor out kexec_locate_mem_hole from kexec_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1915759.R1Bukpmjaj@hactar>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:51:16 -0300
From:	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] kexec_file: Factor out kexec_locate_mem_hole from kexec_add_buffer.

Am Montag, 27 Juni 2016, 13:37:58 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann:
> Should I add a separate top_down argument to kexec_locate_mem_hole to
> control if the memory walk should be from top to bottom, and then the
> bottom_up member of struct kexec_buf controls where inside each memory
> region the memory hole will be allocated?

Er, "...the bottom_up member of struct kexec_buf..." should read "...the 
top_down member of struct kexec buf...".

-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center