linux-kernel - [PATCH V5 2/2] cpufreq: Reuse new freq-table helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <29326603f17249f7636fc4ada43b96ad455fecbb.1467001203.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:59:34 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steve.muckle@...aro.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 2/2] cpufreq: Reuse new freq-table helpers

This patch migrates few users of cpufreq tables to the new helpers that
work on sorted freq-tables.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c         | 14 ++++----------
 drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c |  4 ++--
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     |  6 ++----
 drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c      |  3 +--
 drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c      |  3 +--
 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 32a15052f363..11c9a078e0fd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -468,20 +468,14 @@ unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
 	struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *entry;
-	unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, freq;
+	unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, index;
 
 	/*
 	 * Find the closest frequency above target_freq.
-	 *
-	 * The table is sorted in the reverse order with respect to the
-	 * frequency and all of the entries are valid (see the initialization).
 	 */
-	entry = policy->freq_table;
-	do {
-		entry++;
-		freq = entry->frequency;
-	} while (freq >= target_freq && freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
-	entry--;
+	index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
+
+	entry = &policy->freq_table[index];
 	next_freq = entry->frequency;
 	next_perf_state = entry->driver_data;
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
index 6d5dc04c3a37..042023bbbf62 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static unsigned int amd_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		else {
 			unsigned int index;
 
-			index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy,
-				policy->cur - 1, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+			index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy,
+							   policy->cur - 1);
 			freq_next = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
 		}
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 0c93cd9dee99..3a1f49f5f4c6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -85,11 +85,9 @@ static unsigned int generic_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	freq_avg = freq_req - freq_reduc;
 
 	/* Find freq bounds for freq_avg in freq_table */
-	index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_avg,
-					       CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+	index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, freq_avg);
 	freq_lo = freq_table[index].frequency;
-	index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_avg,
-					       CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+	index = cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, freq_avg);
 	freq_hi = freq_table[index].frequency;
 
 	/* Find out how long we have to be in hi and lo freqs */
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index b29c5c20c3a1..2a2920c4fdf9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -760,8 +760,7 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 
 		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
-		index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.cur,
-					       CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
+		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
 		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
 		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 4f4e9df9b7fc..9e07588ea9f5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 	new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
 
 	/* Finding current running level index */
-	priv_index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, old_freq,
-						    CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+	priv_index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, old_freq);
 
 	arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
 	int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
-- 
2.7.4