linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] nohz,cputime: remove VTIME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160627232105.GA7582@lerouge>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:21:08 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	riel@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, fweisbec@...hat.com,
	wanpeng.li@...mail.com, efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de,
	rkrcmar@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] nohz,cputime: remove VTIME_GEN vtime irq time code

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:25:48PM -0400, riel@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> 
> The CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN irq time tracking code does not
> appear to currently work right.
> 
> On CPUs that are nohz_full, people typically do not assign IRQs.

Right, but they can still fire. At least one tick per second, plus the
pinned timers, etc...

>
> On the housekeeping CPU (when a system is booted up with nohz_full),
> sampling should work ok to determine irq and softirq time use, but
> that only covers the housekeeping CPU itself, not the other
> non-nohz_full CPUs.

Hmm, every non-nohz_full CPUs, including the CPU 0, account the irqtime
the same way: through the tick (and therefore can't account much of it).

So I'm a bit confused by the above statements..

> 
> On CPUs that are nohz_idle (the typical way a distro kernel is
> booted), irq time is not accounted at all while the CPU is idle,
> due to the lack of timer ticks.

But as soon as a timer tick fires in idle or afterward, the pending
irqtime is accounted.

That said I don't see how it explains why we do the below:

> 
> Remove the VTIME_GEN vtime irq time code. The next patch will
> allow NO_HZ_FULL kernels to use the IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code.

I don't get the reason why we are doing this. Now arguably the irqtime
accounting is probably not working as well as before since we switched to
jiffy clock. But I still see some hard irqs accounted when account_irq_exit()
is lucky enough to observe that jiffies changed since the beginning of
the interrupt.

So it's not entirely broken. I agree that we need to switch it to the
generic irqtime accounting code but breaking the code now to reactivate it
in a subsequent patch is prone to future bisection issues.

Thanks.