[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y45ryzgc.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:26:27 +0900
From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
kbuild-all@...org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `printk'
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:38:10 +0900,
Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> [Adding LKML, linux-arch, and Linus.]
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:17:01AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > arch/m32r/kernel/built-in.o: In function `default_eit_handler':
> > >> (.text+0x3f8): undefined reference to `printk'
> > arch/m32r/kernel/built-in.o: In function `default_eit_handler':
> > (.text+0x3f8): relocation truncated to fit: R_M32R_26_PCREL_RELA against undefined symbol `printk'
>
> As far as I can tell, there has been a patch available for this for
> months, and it still doesn't seem to have been applied anywhere.
>
> m32r is listed in MAINTAINERS as "Orphan", and has been since commit
> b4174867bee83e79dc155479cb1b67c452da6476 in 2014. And that commit
> in turn observed no commits from the maintainer since 2009. Looking at
> the log for arch/m32r, I don't see any activity other than random fixes
> by others, and based on the signoffs, all of those seem to go through
> miscellaneous trees.
>
> Is anyone using m32r? Is anyone willing to maintain it? And if not,
> should we consider removing it?
I have m32r target.
So I can testing and housekeeping.
If I'm not in other ones, I work.
> - Josh Triplett
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists