[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ciGJiv7JZPq7B-qGz2vtQ9s7SnbTXgwEHwTO-jLPio0XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:33:18 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest?
Send again to correct addresses, sorry!
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging
> purpose, I use lots of trace_printk() since it's faster than normal
> printk(). When kernel crash happens the trace buffer is printed on
> console (I set ftrace_dump_on_oops) but it takes too much time. I
> don't want to reduce the size of ring buffer as I want to collect the
> debug info as much as possible. And I also want to see trace from all
> cpu so 'ftrace_dump_on_oop = 2' is not an option.
>
> I know the kexec/kdump (and the crash tool) can dump and analyze the
> trace buffer later. But it's cumbersome to do it everytime and more
> importantly, I don't want to spend the memory for the crashkernel.
>
> So what is the best way to handle this? I'd like to know how others
> setup the debugging environment..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists