linux-kernel - [RESEND RFC v2] mmc: Change the max discard sectors and erase response if mmc host supports busy signalling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <54f75bccac6e6e49d87a5122ea670038b508b33c.1465808036.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:25:47 +0800
From:	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:	ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc:	adrian.hunter@...el.com, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
	shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, dianders@...omium.org, heiko@...ech.de,
	david@...tonic.nl, hdegoede@...hat.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, baolin.wang@...aro.org
Subject: [RESEND RFC v2] mmc: Change the max discard sectors and erase response if mmc host supports busy signalling

When mmc host HW supports busy signalling (using R1B as response), We
shouldn't use 'host->max_busy_timeout' as the limitation when deciding
the max discard sectors that we tell the generic BLOCK layer about.
Instead, we should pick one preferred erase size as the max discard
sectors.

If the host controller supports busy signalling and the timeout for
the erase operation does not exceed the max_busy_timeout, we should
use R1B response. Or we need to prevent the host from doing hw busy
detection, which is done by converting to a R1 response instead.

Changes since v1:
  - Remove the 'MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY' flag checking when deciding
    the max discard sectors.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/core.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 8b4dfd4..edd43b1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -2060,7 +2060,7 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from,
 			unsigned int to, unsigned int arg)
 {
 	struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
-	unsigned int qty = 0;
+	unsigned int qty = 0, busy_timeout = 0;
 	unsigned long timeout;
 	int err;
 
@@ -2128,8 +2128,23 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from,
 	memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_command));
 	cmd.opcode = MMC_ERASE;
 	cmd.arg = arg;
-	cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
-	cmd.busy_timeout = mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty);
+	busy_timeout = mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty);
+	/*
+	 * If the host controller supports busy signalling and the timeout for
+	 * the erase operation does not exceed the max_busy_timeout, we should
+	 * use R1B response. Or we need to prevent the host from doing hw busy
+	 * detection, which is done by converting to a R1 response instead.
+	 */
+	if ((card->host->max_busy_timeout &&
+	    busy_timeout > card->host->max_busy_timeout) ||
+	    !(card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY)) {
+		cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
+		cmd.busy_timeout = 0;
+	} else {
+		cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
+		cmd.busy_timeout = busy_timeout;
+	}
+
 	err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, 0);
 	if (err) {
 		pr_err("mmc_erase: erase error %d, status %#x\n",
@@ -2321,23 +2336,39 @@ static unsigned int mmc_do_calc_max_discard(struct mmc_card *card,
 					    unsigned int arg)
 {
 	struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
-	unsigned int max_discard, x, y, qty = 0, max_qty, timeout;
+	unsigned int max_discard, x, y, qty = 0, max_qty, min_qty, timeout;
 	unsigned int last_timeout = 0;
 
-	if (card->erase_shift)
+	if (card->erase_shift) {
 		max_qty = UINT_MAX >> card->erase_shift;
-	else if (mmc_card_sd(card))
+		min_qty = card->pref_erase >> card->erase_shift;
+	} else if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
 		max_qty = UINT_MAX;
-	else
+		min_qty = card->pref_erase;
+	} else {
 		max_qty = UINT_MAX / card->erase_size;
+		min_qty = card->pref_erase / card->erase_size;
+	}
 
 	/* Find the largest qty with an OK timeout */
 	do {
 		y = 0;
 		for (x = 1; x && x <= max_qty && max_qty - x >= qty; x <<= 1) {
 			timeout = mmc_erase_timeout(card, arg, qty + x);
-			if (timeout > host->max_busy_timeout)
+			/*
+			 * We should not only use 'host->max_busy_timeout' as
+			 * the limitation when deciding the max discard sectors.
+			 * We should set a balance value to improve the erase
+			 * speed, and it can not get too long timeout at the
+			 * same time.
+			 *
+			 * Here we set 'card->pref_erase' as the minimal discard
+			 * sectors when deciding the max discard sectors.
+			 */
+			if (qty + x > min_qty &&
+			    timeout > host->max_busy_timeout)
 				break;
+
 			if (timeout < last_timeout)
 				break;
 			last_timeout = timeout;
-- 
1.7.9.5