linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32026.1467099166@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:32:46 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad

Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:

> @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ struct rxrpc_connection {
>  	struct key		*key;		/* security for this connection (client) */
>  	struct key		*server_key;	/* security for this service */
>  	struct crypto_skcipher	*cipher;	/* encryption handle */
> +	struct rxrpc_crypt	csum_iv_head;	/* leading block for csum_iv */
>  	struct rxrpc_crypt	csum_iv;	/* packet checksum base */
>  	unsigned long		events;
>  #define RXRPC_CONN_CHALLENGE	0		/* send challenge packet */

NAK.  This won't work.  csum_iv_head is per packet being processed, but you've
put it in rxrpc_connection which is shared amongst several creators/digestors
of packets.  Putting it in rxrpc_call won't work either since it's also needed
for connection level packets.

David