[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57722AB8.8020208@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:13:52 +0530
From: Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] input: tps65218-pwrbutton: Add
platform_device_id table
On Tuesday 28 June 2016 01:11 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Keerthy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 28 June 2016 12:19 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Keerthy wrote:
>>>
>>>> platform_device_id table is needed for adding the tps65218-pwrbutton
>>>> module to the mfd_cell array.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c | 7 +++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c b/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
>>>> index 2bba8de..a0cb7d2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
>>>> @@ -113,12 +113,19 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_tps65218_pwr_match[] = {
>>>> };
>>>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_tps65218_pwr_match);
>>>>
>>>> +static const struct platform_device_id tps65218_pwrbtn_id_table[] = {
>>>> + { "tps65218-pwrbutton", },
>>>> + { /* sentinel */ }
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Missing ';'. Did you build test this?
>>
>> Oops sorry for the mess. Yes i built and booted. While reviewing and just
>> before sending i have accidentally deleted. I will send a v4 in a bit. I
>> will send v4 of this patch.
>>
>> I just checked now. It somehow compiles silently even with the ';' missing!
>> I will send a v4.
>
> Are you sure this driver is enable in the CONFIG?
Yes! I think the MACRO Below covers up for the missing ';' and hence
went unnoticed :-/
>
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, tps65218_pwrbtn_id_table);
>>>> +
>>>> static struct platform_driver tps65218_pwron_driver = {
>>>> .probe = tps65218_pwron_probe,
>>>> .driver = {
>>>> .name = "tps65218_pwrbutton",
>>>> .of_match_table = of_tps65218_pwr_match,
>>>> },
>>>> + .id_table = tps65218_pwrbtn_id_table,
>>>> };
>>>> module_platform_driver(tps65218_pwron_driver);
>>>>
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists