[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3990550.tEk9cGVQPW@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:37:52 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@....de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@...aro.org)" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:00:47 AM CEST Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Monday 27 June 2016 23:36:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday, June 27, 2016 11:15:25 AM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > > Changes since 20160624:
> > > on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ...
> > > but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this in drivers/gpio/Kconfig:
> > >
> > > config OF_GPIO
> > >
> > > def_bool y
> > > depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> > >
> > > (above from commit 1e4a80640338924b9f9fd7a121ac31d08134410a
> > > from Alexander Stein <alexanders83@....de>)
> > >
> > >
> > > ../drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-iproc-gpio.c:381:20: error:
> > > 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > ../drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c:739:20: error:
> > > 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_group' undeclared here (not in a
> > > function) ../drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:365:20: error:
> > > 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > >
> > > because that function is only present when CONFIG_OF is enabled.
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, why does that commit (1e4a80640338924b9f9fd7a121ac31d08134410a)
> > > not have any other S-O-B lines in it? like whoever merged it?
> >
> > (adding Linus Walleij and Alexander Stein to Cc)
> >
> > Unfortunately, the changelog also doesn't say what triggered that
> > change. I guess there was a driver that did 'select OF_GPIO'
> > and had a dependency on COMPILE_TEST, though I don't see any
> > driver doing that in linux-next.
>
> It was the first change of the changes done in my branch
> https://github.com/AlexanderStein/linux/tree/gpio-compile-test
> in order to compile test as much gpio drivers as possible. Yet, pinctrl
> drivers were out of my scope.
I see
> > I think the commit should just be reverted, it clearly breaks
> > stuff, and whatever needs it can be fixed in a better way.
>
> Why not depend PINCTRL_IPROC_GPIO on CONFIG_OF as Randy stated
> pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin and friends are only present if CONFIG_OF
> is enabled. Depending on OF_GPIO only is enough under the assumption a) you
> made below.
> Also what about providing dummy implementation for those missing function in
> case CONFIG_OF is disabled, my preference as more code can be compile tested.
>
> > Specifically, we have three ways that the OF_GPIO symbol
> > is used:
> >
> > a) it is implicitly enabled when both GPIOLIB and OF are turned on
>
> or if COMPILE_TEST is enabled
>
> I think a problem in this and possibly other cases is that COMPILE_TEST
> loosens the Kconfig dependencies to some degree. How to proceed? Allow compile
> testing drivers only if some optional settings are enabled?
I think we can start by reverting your patch: for compile-testing we can
always enable CONFIG_OF these days, which will also turn on OF_GPIO.
Compile-testing drivers that need OF_GPIO while OF is disabled makes
no sense to me, it's not a configuration that anybody can ever use
and it adds no build coverage.
I think we should also drop all 'select OF_GPIO' statements, AFAICT
we have just proven that they are all redundant because they would
have otherwise broken things. This should be a separate cleanup patch.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists