lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160628094914.GI1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:49:14 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:	patrice.chotard@...com
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...inux.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
	lee.jones@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: sti: Implement dummy L2 cache's write_sec

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:40:37AM +0200, patrice.chotard@...com wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
> 
> This patch implements the write_sec callback that handle PL310
> secure registers writes.
> This callback is just a stub for now, to avoid system crash.
> Later, it could handle SMC calls so that TZ handles the needed writes.

Is there much point having the L2 cache DT node enabled if you have
no support for the writes, which are required for the hardware to be
enabled?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ