linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160628150141.GH24982@dell>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:01:41 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:25:43 +0200
> 
> Several update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (6):
>   twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc()
>     in add_numbered_child()
>   twl-core: Refactoring for add_numbered_child()
>   dm355evm_msp: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc()
>     in add_child()
>   dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child()
>   smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation
>     in smsc_i2c_probe()
>   smsc-ece1099: Return directly after a function failure
>     in smsc_i2c_probe()
> 
>  drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 11 ++++-------
>  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c     | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

What is this set?  A different but related one to the set you tagged
it on to?  Probably best not to do that.  I now have a huge entangled
thread in my inbox, which is going to become out of control rather
quickly (if it isn't already).

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog