lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160628153346.GF4585@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:33:46 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:	will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com, steve.capper@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to
 sysfs

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:12:36PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> +#define CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(_name)							\
> +	static ssize_t show_##_name(struct device *dev,				\
> +			struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)		\
> +	{									\
> +		struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, dev->id);	\
> +										\
> +		if (info->reg_midr)						\
> +			return sprintf(buf, "0x%016x\n", info->reg_##_name);	\
> +		else								\
> +			return 0;						\
> +	}									\
> +	static DEVICE_ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
> +
> +CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(midr);
> +CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(revidr);

Since exposing these values is aimed at JIT code (and not human
readable), wouldn't it make more sense to present the binary value
instead of the ascii transformation?

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ