[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jQA29oY2e6mVjQ=mEyBRXev3fAn1=2BH_GjzvQN6N4Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:33:10 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86/mm: only allow memmap=XX!YY over existing RAM
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com> wrote:
> Before this patch, passing a range that is beyond the physical memory
> range will succeed, the user will see a /dev/pmem0 and will be able to
> access it. Reads will always return 0 and writes will be silently
> ignored.
>
> I've gotten more than one bug report about mkfs.{xfs,ext4} or nvml
> failing that were eventually tracked down to be wrong values passed to
> memmap.
>
> This patch prevents the above issue by instead of adding a new memory
> range, only update a RAM memory range with the PRAM type. This way,
> passing the wrong memmap will either not give you a pmem at all or give
> you a smaller one that actually has RAM behind it.
>
> And if someone still needs to fake a pmem that doesn't have RAM behind
> it, they can simply do memmap=XX@YY,XX!YY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
> Tested-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
> ---
I have some other libnvdimm fixes heading upstream shortly if x86
folks just want to ack this one...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists