[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8a587d0-814a-e71e-0312-d0b5f71022c4@toradex.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:24:00 +0530
From: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <stefan@...er.ch>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<jslaby@...e.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: consider TX FIFO too in
tx_empty
On 06/26/16 02:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:40:32PM +0530, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
>> From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>>
>> Currently the tx_empty callback only considers the Transmit Complete
>> Flag (TC). The reference manual is not quite clear if the TC flag
>> covers the TX FIFO too. Debug prints on real hardware have shown that
>> from time to time the TC flag is asserted (indicating Transmitter
>> idle) while there are still data in the TX FIFO. Hence, in this case
>> the serial core will call the shutdown callback even though there are
>> data remaining in the TX FIFO buffers.
>>
>> Avoid early shutdowns by considering the TX FIFO empty flag too. Also
>> avoid theoretical race conditions between DMA and the driver by
>> checking whether the TX DMA is in progress too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> Why are you not signing off on patches that are flowing through you?
> Please fix this up and resend the series, after breaking up the clock
> change as asked.
Okay
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists