linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection if device implements confidence usage"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrUwUkx3sdup2zbVn0n1Hegi5qwk1OHzTYYpLYkP95Tykg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:38:17 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:	Allen Hung <allen_hung@...l.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "HID: multitouch: enable palm rejection if
 device implements confidence usage"

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> This and patch 2 are:
>>
>> Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> # XPS 13 9350, BIOS 1.4.3
>>
>> (And I'm curious why 1.4.3 seems to have been pulled.  Might it have been
>> this issue?  For better or for worse, I upgraded in the narrow window in
>> which it was available on Dell's website.)
>>
>
> I should amend that Tested-by slightly: these patches seem to make the
> problem merely about as bad as it was before.  It's still not perfect
> -- I still occasionally get stuck touches.

On further investigation, I'm not getting stuck touches AFAICT.  I'm
experiencing an upgraded version of libinput being clever and
incorrectly deciding that I middle-clicked.  Sorry for the noise.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96710

--Andy