[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <57737761.2020708@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:23:13 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: clk: Per controller locks (prepare & enable)
Hi,
Problems:
1. Deadlocks on prepare lock in following scenario:
- prepare_enable(some external clock through i2c)
- i2c transfer
- prepare_enable(i2c lock in SoC)
- deadlock
See [1]. We implemented a workaround for this in few places like
10ff4c5239a1 ("i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C
clock prepared") and 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA deadlock by
keeping clock prepared")
The goal would be to remove also this workaround.
2. The global prepare and enable locks are over-used. I didn't test the
congestion but intuition says that they could be improved.
Solution:
Make this locks per controller. This will directly solve problem #1
because these are different controllers. Still in-controller deadlock
could occur but we couldn't find a real case with it.
Question:
What do you think about it? I know that talk is cheap and code looks
better but before starting the work I would like to hear some
comments/opinions/ideas.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
[1]
http://www.krzk.eu/builders/boot-odroid-xu3-multi_v7/builds/34/steps/Boot%20odroid/logs/serial
Powered by blists - more mailing lists