[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbOBG8g0ifrzF0_Ub2iDS9JpVH_qtEcN+-83dkk4Hz7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:08:39 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Add missing of_node_put
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Amitoj Kaur Chawla
<amitoj1606@...il.com> wrote:
> of_find_node_by_name does an of_node_get on its return value,
> so an of_node_put is needed on this value before the corresponding
> variable goes out of scope.
>
> The Coccinelle semantic patch used to make this change is as follows:
> @@
> struct device_node *n;
> struct device_node *n1;
> statement S;
> identifier f;
> expression E;
> constant C;
> @@
>
> n = of_find_node_by_name(...)
> ...
> if (!n) S
> ... when != of_node_put(n)
> when != n1 = f(n,...)
> when != E = n
> when any
> when strict
> (
> + of_node_put(n);
> return -C;
> |
> of_node_put(n);
> |
> n1 = f(n,...)
> |
> E = n
> |
> return ...;
> )
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists