[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577395C2.5050807@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:02:50 +0530
From: Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] gpio: tps65218-gpio: Add platform_device_id table
On Wednesday 29 June 2016 02:26 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> wrote:
>
>> platform_device_id table is needed for adding the tps65218-gpio
>> module to the mfd_cell array.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>
>> * Retained the compatible strings in order to interrogate the DT in the
>> normal way.
>
> So do I just apply this or do you need it applied through another tree?
>
> It looks standalone, should I just merge it?
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Thanks Linus. I guess this can be merged by you. Is that fine Lee Jones?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists