[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5773BE70.2000802@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:26:24 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux 3/8] x86/xen: use xen_vcpu_id mapping
for HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op
On 28/06/16 17:47, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op passes Linux's idea of vCPU id as a parameter while
> Xen's idea is expected. In some cases these ideas diverge so we need to
> do remapping.
>
> There is an issue, however. PV guests do VCPUOP_is_up very early
> (see xen_fill_possible_map() and xen_filter_cpu_maps()) when we don't have
> perpu areas initialized. While it could be solved with switching to
> early_percpu for xen_vcpu_id I think it's not worth it: PV guests will
> probably never get to the point where their idea of vCPU id diverges from
> Xen's.
[...]
> static inline int
> HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(int cmd, int vcpuid, void *extra_args)
> {
> - return _hypercall3(int, vcpu_op, cmd, vcpuid, extra_args);
> + /*
> + * PV guests call HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op before percpu areas are
> + * initialized. As we always use direct mapping for vCPU ids
> + * for them we can simply use Linux vcpuid here.
> + */
> + return _hypercall3(int, vcpu_op, cmd,
> + per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, vcpuid) != -1 ?
> + per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, vcpuid) : vcpuid,
> + extra_args);
> }
HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op() should take Xen VCPUs, with the callers doing the
mapping.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists