[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5773EADE.70600@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:35:58 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
Cc: david.vrabel@...rix.com, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
julia.lawall@...6.fr, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xen: Use DIV_ROUND_UP
On 29/06/16 17:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 29.06.16 at 17:00, <amitoj1606@...il.com> wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static void xen_load_gdt(const struct desc_ptr *dtr)
>> {
>> unsigned long va = dtr->address;
>> unsigned int size = dtr->size + 1;
>> - unsigned pages = (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
>> + unsigned pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> unsigned long frames[pages];
>> int f;
>>
>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static void __init xen_load_gdt_boot(const struct desc_ptr *dtr)
>> {
>> unsigned long va = dtr->address;
>> unsigned int size = dtr->size + 1;
>> - unsigned pages = (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
>> + unsigned pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> unsigned long frames[pages];
>> int f;
>>
>
> Perhaps even more readable would be PFN_DOWN()?
Or PFN_UP() to be correct?
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists