lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACbG3091xWHUKm6zQSK9oAZ6T0kM+WzYhE_DXdk+wMQk-6FUdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:06:58 -0500
From:	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf tests: Fix thread map test for -F option

On 28 June 2016 at 06:29, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> I hit a bug when running test suite without forking
> each test (-F option):
>
>   $ perf test -Fv
>   ...
>   34: Test thread map                                          :
>   --- start ---
>   FAILED tests/thread-map.c:24 wrong comm
>   ---- end ----
>   Test thread map: FAILED!
>
> The reason was the process name wasn't 'perf' as expected
> by the test, because other tests set the name as well.
>
> Setting it explicitly now.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-bqapag0ljaiwmb7hlkw09zk5@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>


This patch also seems fine.  Again, I confirmed that test 34 fails
without the patch and that this patch fixed it.

--
Nilay

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ