[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5773F30F.3020201@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 18:10:55 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Wan Zongshun <vw@...mu.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Clocksource: add nuc970 clocksource driver
On 06/29/2016 05:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:37:19 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote:
>> This patch is to add nuc970 clocksource driver support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
>> ---
>> .../mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-timer.h | 44 +++++
>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 8 +
>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clocksource/timer-nuc900.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 260 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-timer.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/timer-nuc900.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-timer.h b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-timer.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..43d7e8b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-timer.h
>
> Please move the contents of the header file into the driver. We try to not
> have any new mach/*.h headers.
>
>> +
>> +static unsigned int timer0_load;
>> +static void __iomem *tmr_base;
>> +
>> +static int nuc970_clockevent_set_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *evt)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int val;
>> +
>> + val = __raw_readl(tmr_base + REG_TMR_TCSR0);
>> + val &= ~(0x03 << 27);
>> +
>> + val |= (ONESHOT | COUNTEN | INTEN | PRESCALE);
>> +
>> + __raw_writel(val, tmr_base + REG_TMR_TCSR0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> writel() instead of __raw_writel()
Wan Zongshun,
FYI : https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/18/422
Not sure it does a noticeable difference on arm926.
Thanks Arnd for the clarification.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists