[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1606291104130.37168@mjmartin-mac01.local>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
cc: dhowells@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
smueller@...onox.de, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
marcel@...tmann.org, mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] crypto: AF_ALG - add support for key_id
Tadeusz,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> This patch adds support for asymmetric key type to AF_ALG.
> It will work as follows: A new PF_ALG socket options are
> added on top of existing ALG_SET_KEY and ALG_SET_PUBKEY, namely
> ALG_SET_KEY_ID and ALG_SET_PUBKEY_ID for setting public and
> private keys respectively. When these new options will be used
> the user, instead of providing the key material, will provide a
> key id and the key itself will be obtained from kernel keyring
> subsystem. The user will use the standard tools (keyctl tool
> or the keyctl syscall) for key instantiation and to obtain the
> key id. The key id can also be obtained by reading the
> /proc/keys file.
>
> When a key corresponding to the given keyid is found, it is stored
> in the socket context and subsequent crypto operation invoked by the
> user will use the new asymmetric accessor functions instead of akcipher
> api. The asymmetric subtype can internally use akcipher api or
> invoke operations defined by a given subtype, depending on the
> key type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
> ---
> crypto/af_alg.c | 10 ++
> crypto/algif_akcipher.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/crypto/if_alg.h | 1
> include/uapi/linux/if_alg.h | 2
> 4 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/algif_akcipher.c b/crypto/algif_akcipher.c
> index 2b8d37e..106f715 100644
> --- a/crypto/algif_akcipher.c
> +++ b/crypto/algif_akcipher.c
> +static int asym_key_verify(const struct key *key, struct akcipher_request *req)
> +{
> + struct public_key_signature sig;
> + char *src = NULL, *in, digest[20];
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!sg_is_last(req->src)) {
> + src = kmalloc(req->src_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!src)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + scatterwalk_map_and_copy(src, req->src, 0, req->src_len, 0);
> + in = src;
> + } else {
> + in = sg_virt(req->src);
> + }
> + sig.pkey_algo = "rsa";
> + sig.encoding = "pkcs1";
> + /* Need to find a way to pass the hash param */
Comment still needed?
> + sig.hash_algo = "sha1";
> + sig.digest_size = sizeof(digest);
> + sig.digest = digest;
> + sig.s_size = req->src_len;
> + sig.s = src;
> + ret = verify_signature(key, &sig);
> + if (!ret) {
> + req->dst_len = sizeof(digest);
I think you fixed the BUG_ON() problem but there's still an issue with the
handling of the digest. Check the use of sig->digest in
public_key_verify_signature(), it's an input not an output. Right now it
looks like 20 uninitialized bytes are compared with the computed digest
within verify_signature, and then the unintialized bytes are copied to
req->dst here.
With some modifications to public_key_verify_signature you could get the
digest you need, but I'm not sure if verification with a hardware key
(like a key in a TPM) can or can not provide the digest needed. Maybe this
is why the verify_signature hook in struct asymmetric_key_subtype is
optional.
> + scatterwalk_map_and_copy(digest, req->dst, 0, req->dst_len, 1);
> + }
> + kfree(src);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
--
Mat Martineau
Intel OTC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists