[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1467227263-31349-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:07:43 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, luca.abeni@...tn.it, juri.lelli@....com
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity
setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
as we currently do
setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl)
However, before Luca's change we were doing
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se)
in update_dl_entity() for a dl_se->new entity: we were using pi_se's
parameters (the potential PI donor) for setting up a new entity.
Restore this behaviour (as we want to correctly initialize parameters of
a boosted task that enters DEADLINE) by removing the useless second
parameter of setup_new_dl_entity() and retrieving the top waiter
directly from inside that function.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
Changes from v1:
- Steve pointed out that we were actually using the second parameter
to permorm initialization
- Luca confirmed that behavior is slightly changed w.r.t. before his
change
- changelog updated and original behavior restored
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fcb7f0217ff4..2000ad2294d5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -346,11 +346,12 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
* one, and to (try to!) reconcile itself with its own scheduling
* parameters.
*/
-static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
- struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se)
+static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
+ struct task_struct *pi_task = rt_mutex_get_top_task(dl_task_of(dl_se));
+ struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se = dl_se;
WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
@@ -363,6 +364,13 @@ static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
return;
/*
+ * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter task,
+ * if we have one from which we can inherit a deadline.
+ */
+ if (pi_task && dl_se->dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio))
+ pi_se = &pi_task->dl;
+
+ /*
* We use the regular wall clock time to set deadlines in the
* future; in fact, we must consider execution overheads (time
* spent on hardirq context, etc.).
@@ -1721,7 +1729,7 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq_clock(rq)))
- setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl);
+ setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl);
if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists