[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96388f6b-f8b1-5720-4725-3f0ec0f5d1c3@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:19:13 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
eric.auger@...hat.com, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, wim@....tudelft.nl,
perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence
On 6/29/2016 5:14 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 6/29/2016 9:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
>>> Well, this is a rather obvious one, so I'm wondering why it is the
>>> last one in the series?
>>>
>>
>> The first three are more relevant to each other. It makes easy to
>> correlate the changes.
>
> But this one doesn't seem to depend on them and it could be applied
> without them, right?
>
Sure. It has no dependency.
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists