[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160630120601.GC5324@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:06:01 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: perf unwind: Odd message about x86 unwind
Hi He,
While testing a patch by Peter Zijlstra to the --stdio
annotation code I came accross these messages:
[acme@...et linux]$ perf annotate __vdso_gettimeofday 2>&1 | head -20
unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of perf-vdso.so-E5tFUx for cycles:u
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
: Disassembly of section .text:
:
: 0000000000000cd0 <__vdso_gettimeofday@@LINUX_2.6>:
0.00 : cd0: push %rbp
0.00 : cd1: mov %rsp,%rbp
0.00 : cd4: push %r15
0.00 : cd6: push %r14
0.00 : cd8: push %r13
0.00 : cda: push %r12
0.00 : cdc: push %rbx
0.00 : cdd: sub $0x10,%rsp
[acme@...et linux]$
And bisected it down to:
commit 52ffe0ff02fc053a025c381d5808e9ecd3206dfe
Author: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Date: Fri Jun 3 03:33:22 2016 +0000
perf callchain: Support x86 target platform
Support x86(32-bit) cross platform callchain unwind.
Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
--------------------------------------------------
The source code where this message is emitted is:
struct unwind_libunwind_ops __weak *local_unwind_libunwind_ops;
<SNIP>
unwind__prepare_access()
{
struct unwind_libunwind_ops *ops = local_unwind_libunwind_ops;
<SNIP>
if (!strcmp(arch, "x86")) {
if (dso_type != DSO__TYPE_64BIT)
ops = x86_32_unwind_libunwind_ops;
}
<SNIP>
if (!ops) {
pr_err("unwind: target platform=%s is not supported\n", arch);
return -1;
}
So, this should fallback to local_unwind_libunwind_ops, why is this not being
set properly?
Feature detection says:
... libunwind: [ on ]
... libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ]
This is:
[acme@...et linux]$ uname -a
Linux jouet 4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 8 18:12:45 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linuxo
Can you please check this?
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists