[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1467252061-3791-5-git-send-email-chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:01:01 +0800
From: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Wei-Ning Huang <wnhuang@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] mmc: mediatek: perfer to use rise edge latching
in our host design, rise edge latching is more stable than fall edge
latching. so that if rise edge has enough margin, no need scan fall edge.
Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index 91277b9..84e9afc 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static int msdc_tune_response(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
{
struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
u32 rise_delay = 0, fall_delay = 0;
- struct msdc_delay_phase final_rise_delay, final_fall_delay;
+ struct msdc_delay_phase final_rise_delay, final_fall_delay = { 0,};
u8 final_delay, final_maxlen;
int cmd_err;
int i;
@@ -1341,6 +1341,11 @@ static int msdc_tune_response(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
if (!cmd_err)
rise_delay |= (1 << i);
}
+ final_rise_delay = get_best_delay(host, rise_delay);
+ /* if rising edge has enough margin, then do not scan falling edge */
+ if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 10 ||
+ (final_rise_delay.start == 0 && final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 4))
+ goto skip_fall;
sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL);
for (i = 0; i < PAD_DELAY_MAX; i++) {
@@ -1350,10 +1355,9 @@ static int msdc_tune_response(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
if (!cmd_err)
fall_delay |= (1 << i);
}
-
- final_rise_delay = get_best_delay(host, rise_delay);
final_fall_delay = get_best_delay(host, fall_delay);
+skip_fall:
final_maxlen = max(final_rise_delay.maxlen, final_fall_delay.maxlen);
if (final_maxlen == final_rise_delay.maxlen) {
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL);
@@ -1374,7 +1378,7 @@ static int msdc_tune_data(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
{
struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
u32 rise_delay = 0, fall_delay = 0;
- struct msdc_delay_phase final_rise_delay, final_fall_delay;
+ struct msdc_delay_phase final_rise_delay, final_fall_delay = { 0,};
u8 final_delay, final_maxlen;
int i, ret;
@@ -1387,6 +1391,11 @@ static int msdc_tune_data(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
if (!ret)
rise_delay |= (1 << i);
}
+ final_rise_delay = get_best_delay(host, rise_delay);
+ /* if rising edge has enough margin, then do not scan falling edge */
+ if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 10 ||
+ (final_rise_delay.start == 0 && final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 4))
+ goto skip_fall;
sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_DSPL);
sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_W_DSPL);
@@ -1397,14 +1406,10 @@ static int msdc_tune_data(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
if (!ret)
fall_delay |= (1 << i);
}
-
- final_rise_delay = get_best_delay(host, rise_delay);
final_fall_delay = get_best_delay(host, fall_delay);
+skip_fall:
final_maxlen = max(final_rise_delay.maxlen, final_fall_delay.maxlen);
- /* Rising edge is more stable, prefer to use it */
- if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 10)
- final_maxlen = final_rise_delay.maxlen;
if (final_maxlen == final_rise_delay.maxlen) {
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_DSPL);
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_W_DSPL);
--
1.8.1.1.dirty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists